Writing
What SEO Costs in Cairns and What You Should Get for It
SEO quotes in Cairns range from a few hundred dollars a month to that much a week. Where the money goes, where it leaks, and what a month should show you.

If you’ve been shopping around for SEO in Cairns, the quotes probably didn’t make much sense side by side. That’s normal. Pricing in this industry is all over the place, and the gap between what’s promised and what turns up each month can be wider still.
I’ve seen businesses here quoted $800 to $1,500 a week. I’ve also seen what sounds like much the same work quoted at that figure a month. Run both out over a year and the weekly version costs somewhere between $41,600 and $78,000. The monthly one comes in at $9,600 to $18,000. Same town, similar businesses, and on paper, similar promises.
It isn’t only a Cairns thing. An Ahrefs survey of a few hundred SEO providers, mostly overseas and pricing in US dollars, found the most common retainer sat between $501 and $1,000 a month. The dearest weekly quote I’ve seen works out at about $6,500.
Price on its own tells you very little, so it’s worth knowing where the money goes.
Where the money goes
Most SEO fees pay for three things. Someone’s time looking at your site and your market. Content. And getting other websites to mention or link to you. Done well, each is worth paying for. They’re also where I see money disappear most often, because each one can be produced cheaply at volume and still look like work on a report.
Content nobody signed off
This is the big one, and it covers more than blogs. Content is also the copy on your core pages: the home page, your service pages, the page someone lands on when they search for what you do.
It’s the slowest part of SEO to get right, because the owner has to be in it. Good content needs your knowledge: the job you quoted last week, the question every new customer asks, the thing you’d tell a mate before they hired anyone in your trade. Getting that out of a busy owner and through sign-off takes time.
So a lot of it gets skipped. Posts turn up on schedule, written to a keyword, often as a list of tips anyone could have produced, and the owner is asked to trust that it’s working. Some of it is now written by prompting an AI tool and publishing whatever comes back.
On a blog, that mostly wastes money. On a service page it can do real damage. Copy written to be “optimised” without the owner reading it fills its gaps with whatever sounds plausible: a service you don’t offer, a suburb you don’t cover, a product or licence described wrongly, “24/7” when you knock off at five. Customers read that page as your word, and under Australian Consumer Law it’s your business making the claim, whoever typed it. The keyword-heavy version also tends to read like every other page in your industry, which gives nobody a reason to call you.
Google has been clear about where mass-produced content ends up. Its spam policies describe publishing lots of pages mainly to rank, with little original value, as scaled content abuse, and they name generative AI used this way as an example. Its guidance on helpful content asks whether a page shows first-hand experience. A page written without you can’t.
One post a month that sounds like you will do more than four that don’t. Your service pages should be written with you, and you should read every line before they go live.
Links you can buy
Paid link campaigns are the second leak. Links from other sites still matter, and in Cairns they’re one of the main things separating businesses that rank from businesses that don’t. Google’s spam policies treat paying for links that pass ranking value as link spam, though, and the cheap ones tend to come from sites that exist to sell links. That’s the exact pattern its systems are built to spot.
At best you’ve paid for links that get ignored. At worst they become a problem you pay someone else to clean up. The links worth having in a regional market come from real relationships: a supplier, an industry body, the local paper, a business you swap referrals with. They’re slow, and nobody can sell them to you by the dozen.
Work that changes hands
The third leak is harder to see from the outside. A business signs with someone local, the work goes to a junior or an offshore team, and the person who sold the job never touches it again. Outsourcing can work. It fails when nobody doing the work has seen your business, knows what Cairns looks like in the wet season, or would recognise a bad lead if one came through.
The reports usually give it away. They’re long, mostly automated, and full of numbers that don’t connect to anything you’d notice day to day. A favourite is a ranking for a phrase almost nobody searches. Number one for something typed twice a year looks great on page three of a report and does nothing for the phone.
Contracts that outlast the results
Lock-in contracts are the leak I have the least patience for. A minimum term means that if the work stops paying its way in month four, you keep paying anyway. I’ve seen businesses decide to leave, give notice, and then wait out another 30 days of fees. They sat through status calls with a provider they’d already finished with, and they paid for the privilege.
Some arrangements make leaving harder still, because the provider holds your Google Business Profile, your Ads account or the website itself. Walking away then means starting from scratch.
Before you sign anything, ask three things. How long am I committed for? What does it cost to leave? And who owns the accounts if I do?
Why my prices look the way they do
I work on my own, so my capacity has a hard ceiling. There are only so many businesses I can know properly, and I take one per industry, which keeps the list short. Nothing gets handed down a chain. The person reading your search data is the person who writes to you about it.
Every client is month to month, and that’s deliberate. If the work isn’t earning its fee, you shouldn’t be stuck paying it while a contract runs down. You tell me you’re done and that’s the end of it. It keeps me honest too. The only reason anyone stays is that the results are worth it.
My fees start where they do for the same reasons. They’re set out on my pricing page: from $500 a month, with most clients between $650 and $1,200. Scope comes from what your business needs and what your market can return. In a thin regional market that’s sometimes less work than people expect, and the fee should reflect it.
What a month should show you
Whoever you hire, a month of SEO should leave something you can see. These are worth asking at the end of every month:
- What changed on my site, and why that page?
- Who wrote the new content, and did I read it before it went live?
- Where did any new links come from, and would I have heard of those sites?
- Are more of the right people calling or filling in the form?
The last question is the one that pays for the other three.